StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
Americas
Europe
Electricity. The word probably brings to your mind images of lights turning on, the process of charging your cell phone, or even a lightning bolt crossing the skies. For example, did you know that a lightning bolt can carry as much as \(1\) billion volts of electricity? Obviously, we all know the dangers of lightning but just what does it mean for lightning to carry \(1\) billion volts of electricity, and why is it so dangerous?
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenElectricity. The word probably brings to your mind images of lights turning on, the process of charging your cell phone, or even a lightning bolt crossing the skies. For example, did you know that a lightning bolt can carry as much as \(1\) billion volts of electricity? Obviously, we all know the dangers of lightning but just what does it mean for lightning to carry \(1\) billion volts of electricity, and why is it so dangerous?
In this article, we'll explain these very questions by exploring topics like electric charge, field, and potential. First, we'll emphasize the definitions for electric charge, field, and potential. Then, we'll look at their relationships, how to calculate them, and what properties they have through some examples.
Let's start things off with some key definitions. These concepts are going to be used constantly throughout the article and in physics in general, so its important we have a good grasp on them.
The fundamental quantity involved in electricity is electric charge.
Electric charge is a fundamental physical quantity and a property of matter, which can take positive and negative values, determining how a particle is affected by electric or magnetic fields.
We represent electric charge as \(q\) and it is measured in units of Coulombs \(\mathrm{C}\). Alternatively, we can describe the charge of particles using the fundamental charge unit, equal to the charge magnitude of an electron or proton \(1.6\times10^19\,\mathrm{C}\). So a proton has a charge of \(+1\) and an electron \(-1\). A neutron is neutral with \(0\) charge, this is because it is composed of smaller particles, called quarks, whose charge sums to zero. Similarly atoms are neutral because they have an equal number of protons and electrons whose charges balance. However, other fundamental particles like photons or neutrinos have no intrinsic charge, meaning they do not interact with the electromagnetic force at all.
As we touched on previously, electric charges interact with electric fields. An electric field can be a tricky concept to wrap your head around so lets take a closer look.
An Electric Field is a physical vector quantity that takes values at every point in space, defining the force experienced by a test charge sitting at that point in space. Electric charges are sources of electric fields.
Electric fields, alongside magnetic fields, are understood to be manifestations of a more general electromagnetic field. Electric fields exert conservative forces on charges, meaning that the work done by an electric field on a charge is independent of the path taken by the charge, only on its initial and final position.
As the electric field produces conservative forces, they can also be explained in terms of something called electric potentials.
Electric Potential is a scalar quantity assigned to each point in space that defines how much energy or work would be done by the electric field in moving a unit test charge from some reference point to that point in space.
Potential results from what is called a conservative force — the work done in moving a particle from one point to another in the field is independent of the path it takes. Gravity is another example of a conservative force. It will do the same amount of work on an object no matter how that object gets to a certain height.
It is important to note that potential is always defined in relation to some reference point; we cannot measure an absolute potential. Hence, we are usually interested in the potential difference between two points. We represent electric potential with a capital \(V\) and measure it with the unit of Volts \(\mathrm{V}\), equivalent to Joules per Coulomb \(\frac{\mathrm{J}}{\mathrm{C}}\).
We know that like charges repel and opposites attract. Therefore, let's illustrate the concept of electric potential with two point charges: one positive and the other negative.
Fig. 2 may seem a bit counterintuitive. An electron moving closer to a proton will decrease in potential energy as it moves toward the proton, converting its energy to kinetic energy. So it would appear that the low potential should be near the proton. However, by convention, potentials are defined as the energy required to move a positive charge to that position. Hence, the high potential is near the proton as it would take a lot of energy to overcome the repulsive force between the two positive charges.
We can define the potential energy \(U\) of the electron, with charge \(q_e\), in terms of the potential \(V\) using the equation\[U=Vq_e.\]
As \(q_e\) is negative, the electron's potential energy will also be negative, showing that as the electron moves towards regions of high potential, it loses potential energy converting it into kinetic energy.
Now, let's switch out our electron for a proton starting near our first proton. We'll call the proton we replaced for the electron \(\text{Proton}_1\).
Since we measure potential in terms of the amount of work done on a positive charge, placing two positive charges near each other increases their potential. Moving two like charges closer together takes a lot of energy because like charges naturally want to repel. Therefore, to force two like charges together, we have to do work on the system or put energy into it; this means that areas of high potential exist near positively charged particles or objects, and areas of low potential exist around negatively charged particles or objects. Likewise, it takes energy to separate two unlike charges; work is needed to pull the mutually attracting bodies away from one another.
Before we dive into the calculations of electric charge, field, and potential, we will explore an analogy to help us better conceptually understand these concepts. For this section of the article, we'll first think of potential, force, and field in terms of gravity to gain an intuition and then apply this to electricity. Take a look at Fig. 1 below, showing a cyclist preparing to ride up a steep hill.
With gravitational potential energy, a mass increases its potential energy as its height increases; because the Earth's gravity acts as a downward force on it. Therefore, it takes work to go against this force and increase an object's height. This is why the cyclist looks so worried, to maintain their kinetic energy as they cycle up the hill, they will have to put more work in (via their legs) to counteract the increasing gravitational potential as they move from point \(\text{A}\) to point \(\text{B}\). However, once they have reached the top of the hill at\(\text{B}\), the hard part is done and now that gravitational potential is going to make life much easier for them on the way to \(\text{C}\). At the top of the hill, they have some amount of gravitational potential energy, as they push off down the hill this gravitational potential energy is converted into kinetic energy. Converting potential energy into kinetic energy allows the cyclist to ride down the hill without putting any work in themselves, as they move with the gravitational field rather than against it.
Electric potential \(V\) works in a very similar way. Take a look at Fig. 5; we have two electrically charged plates, the red plate is positively charged, and the blue is negatively charged. We can think of these plates a bit like the ground or the top of the hill in Fig. 4. The big difference here is that which plate is the ground and which is the top of the hill depends on the sign of the charge moving between the plates. For positive charges, the 'ground' is the negative plate as they have zero potential energy when they're located at this plate. For negative charges, the ground is the positive plate. Let's consider the path \(\text{A}\rightarrow\text{B}\rightarrow\text{C}\) taken by a positive particle. At point \(\text{A}\), the particle has the lowest potential energy (it's on the ground), to move the particle to \(\text{B}\) external work must be done to move the particle against the electric field increasing its potential energy. At \(\text{B}\) the particle has its highest potential energy, like the biker does when at the top of the hill, and so when moving to \(\text{C}\) the electric field does work on the particle converting potential energy into kinetic energy as the particle is pulled towards \(\text{C}\) by the negative plate. For a negative particle, the path is essentially the same but in reverse, with \(\text{A}\) the 'top of the hill' and \(\text{B}\) the ground.
We can illustrate this with field lines representing a field's force vectors, demonstrating the direction and magnitude of the force experienced by a particle in that field. For electric fields, we draw field lines for positive particles by convention, as can be seen in Fig. 6. Note how the arrows are of equal length; this is because the electric field between two parallel plates is a Uniform Field, having equal strength at every point. Drawing in the field lines highlights how the electric and gravitational examples are similar; in Fig. 7 we see the gravitational field lines pointing down toward the earth's surface. Again, the arrows are of equal length because we can approximate the gravitational field as uniform near the Earth's surface.
Above, we compared electric charge, field, and potential qualitatively. Now, we will compare them mathematically, looking at some of the defining equations.
For point charges, the equation for electric force is given by Coulomb's Law:
$$|\vec F_E | = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{|q_1 q_2 |}{r^2},$$
where \(\vec F_E\) is the net electric force acting on the charges, \(\epsilon_0=8.85\times 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{C^2/(N\,m^2)}\) is a constant known as the permittivity of free space, \(q_1 \) and \(q_2 \) are the charges of the particles, and \(r\) is the distance between them.
Note that the magnitude of the force is directly proportional to the product of the charges but inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
If we are considering any general electric field, the electric field strength \(\vec{E}\) is related to the force \(\vec{F}_E\) experienced by a charge \(q\) in that field using the equation\[\vec{E}=\frac{\vec{F}_E}{q}.\]
For example, if we consider the electric field produced by a charge \(q_1\), then we can use Coulomb's Law and the previous equation to find the field strength\[\begin{align}\vec{E}&=\frac{\vec{F}_E}{q_2}\\&=\frac{1}{q_2}\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{|q_1 q_2 |}{r^2}\\&=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{|q_1|}{r^2}\end{align}\]
As discussed previously, we can also describe electric fields with the quantity of electric potential. If we are considering the electric potential associated with the field surrounding a point charge \(q\), then the potential is given by
$$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r},$$
where \(V\) is the electric potential, \(q\) is the charge producing the field, and \(r\) is the distance from the place we want to measure the electric potential to our charge.
The easiest way to see electrical properties is to compare them to their gravitational counterparts. So we can continue making connections to gravity as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 - Comparing electricity to gravity.
Physical Concept | Gravity | Electricity |
Unit | Mass \(m\) in \(\mathrm{kg}\) | Charge \(q\) in \(\mathrm{C}\) |
Distance | Height \(h\) in \(\mathrm{m}\) | Separation distance \(r\) in \(\mathrm{m}\) |
Field | Gravitational Field \(\vec g\) in \(\mathrm{N/kg}\) | Electric Field \(\vec E\) in \(\mathrm{V/m}\) or \(\mathrm{N/C}\) |
Potential \(V\) for both types | \(V = \frac{U}{m} \) | \(V = \frac{U}{q}\) |
Force from a Uniform Field | \(F_g = m\vec g\) | \(F_E = q\vec E\) |
Force on two particles | \(F_g = \frac{Gm_1 m_2}{r^2}\) | \(|\vec F_E | = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{|q_1 q_2 |}{r^2}\) |
Potential Energy for a Uniform Field \(U\) | \(U=mg\Delta h = F_g \Delta h\) | \(U=Fr\) |
Here we highlight a few key points from the table above:
Let's recap what we've learned with some examples.
An electron is directly placed inside a constant electric field of magnitude \(150\,\mathrm{N/C}\). What is the electric force of the electric field on the electron? The charge of an electron is \(-1.602\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C}.\)
Remember that our formula for the force of an electric field is
$$\vec{F}_E = q\vec E.$$
So, to find the force, we can plug in our values. Let's represent the left direction as negative and the right as positive.
$$\begin{align*} \vec{F}_E &= q\vec E \\ \vec{F}_E &= (-1.602 \times 10^{-19} \,\mathrm{C})(150\,\mathrm{N/C}) \\ \vec{F}_E &= -2.4\times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{N}. \\ \end{align*}$$
Therefore, the electron feels a force of \(2.4\times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{N}\) to the left.
Now let's look at an example involving two particles.
Find the magnitude of the electric force that the proton exerts over the electron shown in Fig. 9. What is the magnitude of the electric potential that the proton generates at the electron's position? Use \(-1.602\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C}\) for the charge of an electron and \(1.602\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C}\) for the charge of a proton. Remember that a nanometer equals \(10^{-9}\) meters.
Before we begin solving, we need to find the distance between our two charges. Note that the grid above has units of nanometers. To find the distance between the proton and the electron, we can use the Pythagorean theorem:
$$r = \sqrt{(4\,\mathrm{nm})^2 + (4\,\mathrm{nm})^2} = 4\sqrt{2} \,\mathrm{nm}.$$
Now, we'll solve for the electric force using our equation for two point charges:
$$\begin{align*} |\vec F_E | &= \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0 } \frac{|q_1 q_2 |}{r^2} \\ &= \frac{1}{4\pi (8.85\times 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{C^2/(N\,m^2)})} \frac{(1.602\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C})^2}{(4\sqrt{2}\,\mathrm{nm})^2} \\ &= \frac{1\,\mathrm{N\,m^2}}{4\pi (8.85\times 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{C^2})} \frac{2.566\times 10^{-38}\,\mathrm{C^2}}{(4\sqrt{2} \times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{m})^2} \\ |\vec F_E| &= 7.21\times 10^{-12}. \\ \end{align*}$$
Finally, let's find the electric potential \(V\) that the proton generates at the electron's position:
$$\begin{align*} V&= \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0 } \frac{q}{r} \\ &= \frac{1}{4\pi (8.85\times 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{C^2/(N\,m^2))}} \frac{1.602\times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C}}{4\sqrt{2}\times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{m}} \\ V &= 0.25\,\mathrm{V}. \\ \end{align*}$$
The example above gives us the amount of electric potential that exists between a proton and an electron that are \(4\sqrt{2}\) nanometers apart, coming out to about \(0.25\,\mathrm{V}\). To put that in perspective, your average lightbulb holds about \(120\,\mathrm{V}\), so about \(473\) times the electric potential between our proton and electron. But wait, didn't we say that a lightning bolt generates \(1\) billion volts of electricity? That's a lot of light bulbs! Nearly \(8\,333\,333\) of them!
$$|\vec F_E | = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{|q_1 q_2 |}{r^2}$$
$$\vec F=q\vec E$$ is the equation for the force on a charged particle or object in an electric field.
We can find the electric potential due to a point charge (relative to a reference point at infinity) by using the equation below:
$$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q}{r}$$
Electric potential is the energy needed to move one unit of positive electric charge to a certain reference point against an electric field.
The potential of a charge in an electric field is the amount of work needed to move one unit of that particle's positive electric charge.
Electric potential is not equal to the electric field. Electric potential is related to electric potential energy and electric field relates to the electric force. Electric potential is a scalar quantity but electric field is a vector quantity.
An electric field is a vector quantity that represents the force that a (positive) unit test charge would feel at any position relative to the source. On the other hand, electric potential is the energy needed to move one unit of positive electric charge to a certain reference point against an electric field.
Electric charge is not calculated; it is measured. You can calculate the electric field by dividing the electric force by the particle's charge inside the field. You can find the potential by dividing the electric potential energy by the particle's charge.
Flashcards in Electric Charge Field and Potential391
Start learningA uniform electric field is one in which the electric field strength varies at all points.
False.
How can we describe the electric field between two parallel plates that are oppositely charged?
The field is uniform.
In what direction do the electric field lines between oppositely charged parallel plates point?
Positive plate to negative plate.
What is the SI unit of measurement for electric field strength \(E\)?
\(\mathrm{V\,m^{-1}}\)
What is the correct equation for the electric field strength \(E\) between parallel plates for a potential difference \(V\) and plate separation \(r\)?
\(E=\frac{V}{r}\)
What is the correct equation for the electric field strength \(E\) between two parallel plates with charge \(Q\) and plate surface area \(A\)?
\(E=\frac{Q}{\varepsilon_{0}A}\)
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.
Already have an account? Log in